Skip to content
Assessment
Starting Point

Step 6: Compare and correct every year

Controlling is closing the loop: comparing planned against actual after each cycle and correcting in writing, for at least two cycles in a row.

Updated 5 min read
In this article

You today

One cycle ends, another begins, and you repeat what you did without knowing whether the past decision was good or just lucky. The year turns; the learning does not. You work as hard as ever, but you do not grow wiser from one cycle to the next, because you never stop to compare what you planned with what actually happened.

Why this step exists

Controlling is closing the loop: after each cycle, comparing planned against actual, understanding why the difference appeared, and correcting the next cycle in writing. It is the step that gives meaning to all the others, because it is here that the record, the measure, and the plan become learning. Recording, measuring, and planning without controlling is gathering information and never using it.

Closing the loop is the heart of management, and it is where most people stop. Plenty of people plan, and plenty execute; few come back to the plan at the end to see what happened and adjust. Close the loop, and you turn each cycle into a lesson for the next, and it is that difference that adds up over the years.

This only works over time

A single cycle does not condemn a decision, because the bad year may have been the weather or the price, not your mistake. That is why control compares year against year, with at least two cycles in a row. It is also why this is the last step: it needs two of the Step 2 measures before it has anything to compare. Comparing against a reference, your region’s, is one of the practices research most links to those who do well, even without proving cause; comparing against your own series over the years is this guide’s extension of the same idea.

What to control

  • Planned against actual, by area. Put the Step 3 plan side by side with what happened, area by area (the field, or the lot), and not just the total, because the total hides the area that did badly inside the average.
  • Your series of cost per unit. The cost per bushel, per hundredweight, per head, cycle after cycle, to see the trend and not just the point.
  • The comparison with the outside. Your cost and your price against your region’s reference, where there is one.
  • How your goal is going. Are you closer to the goal you set in Step 0? Control is not only of production numbers; it is also checking whether the farm is moving in the direction you chose.

How to

After the harvest or the finishing, set aside time and put the Step 3 budget next to what happened, area by area. Where it came out different, do not stop at “it came out different”: write why (a wrong price assumption? a wrong output assumption? a decision that did not work? an odd year?) and write what changes in the next cycle’s budget because of it. That written sentence, the why plus the correction, is the product of this step. Do it for at least two cycles in a row, because it is the comparison between them that separates a pattern from chance.

Why keep at it

Control is the step with the slowest payback and, for that reason, the most abandoned. In the first cycle you compare and have little to compare with; the real value arrives in the second and the third, when the series starts to show a pattern. Give up in the first year and you never reach the point where control pays. The discipline is to mark on the calendar, at every cycle’s end, the moment to sit down and close the loop, with the same seriousness you give a harvest or a cattle shipment. It is the commitment that turns work into experience.

Common mistakes, and how to avoid them

  • Repeating without comparing. Turning the year without looking at the last one is working hard and learning nothing. Always compare.
  • Condemning a decision on one cycle. A single bad year can throw off the reading. Compare at least two cycles before you conclude.
  • Comparing only the total. The average hides the area that lost money. Compare by area.
  • Correcting in your head. A correction that is not written does not reach the next plan. Write the why and the adjustment.
  • Skipping the goal. Numbers in order and life off course is managing only half the farm. Check how your Step 0 goal is going too.

Where to start

After the next harvest or finishing, make just one comparison: take the Step 3 budget for one area and put it next to what happened in it. Where it diverged, write why and what changes in the next budget. In the following cycle, repeat, and you will have started your series.

Done when

You compare, after each cycle, planned against actual, understand the difference, and correct the next cycle in writing, for at least two cycles in a row. Reaching here, you have closed the loop, from plan to correction, and you build up experience year by year instead of only repeating it.

What this step does not cover

This is comparing your plan with what happened, to learn and correct; it is not tax accounting or a formal audit, which follow their own rules and, where your case calls for it, are a matter for a qualified professional. And the technique that makes an area yield more stays with the agronomist or the vet; here you learn to see what your management produced, not to change the recipe of production.