Skip to content
Assessment
LibraryProduction

Soybean harvest loss: write your limit before harvest

Published tolerances for soybean harvest loss differ by a factor of two or more. A limit written before harvest, checked against a bean count in each field, shows which field went over and which part of the machine lost the grain.

Published Updated 12 min read
In this article

A soybean farmer in northeast Louisiana who lets 4 bushels per acre fall behind the combine, with a written limit of 2.2, gives up $28,350 on 1,500 acres (example price: $10.50 a bushel). Write the loss you accept before harvest starts. Then count the beans on the ground behind the combine, field by field, and mark each field that came in over.

Harvest loss here means grain that ends up on the ground instead of in the bin: beans the header never gathered and beans thrown out the back of the machine. Without a written limit, one person calls the loss normal, another calls it too much, and nobody settles it.

How much grain is too much to leave behind a combine?

A University of Georgia Extension bulletin says harvest losses of 10 percent or more are not unusual, when they should be in the 2 to 4 percent range. On a field expected to yield 55 bushels per acre, 2 percent is 1.1 bushels per acre and 4 percent is 2.2. The example farm writes 2.2 as its limit for the year.

Other published tolerances sit lower. Embrapa, Brazil’s public farm-research agency, sets the tolerable soybean loss at 60 kilograms per hectare, about 0.9 bushel per acre. A talk to Aapresid, the Argentine no-till growers association, gives 4 percent of yield, and 105 kilograms per hectare for yields above 2,500, about 1.6 bushels per acre on the example field.

Each figure comes from a different country and a different set of machines, so none of them is yours. In the first year, write one as your limit and date it. Later, revise it with your own counts, always before harvest.

Figure: Published soybean loss tolerances on a 55-bushel field, in bushels per acre, against the loss counted in the example field. Source: Georgia Extension, Embrapa and Aapresid; units converted
Four published tolerances all sit below the loss counted in the example fieldIn bushels per acre: Embrapa 0.9, Georgia at 2 percent of yield 1.1, Aapresid 1.6, Georgia at 4 percent of yield 2.2. The loss counted in the example field is 4.0.Loss in bushels per acreEmbrapa, 60 kg per hectare0.9Georgia, 2 percent of 55 bushels1.1Aapresid, 105 kg per hectare1.6Georgia, 4 percent of 55 bushels2.2Example field, counted4.0

How do you count the loss in a field?

Lay out a frame that encloses 10 square feet across the swath, the width the combine cuts, and count the beans inside it. A 20-foot swath needs a frame 6 inches long: 10 divided by 20 is 0.5 foot. The Georgia bulletin lists the length for each common swath.

Stop the combine at least 100 feet from the row end without clearing it, drop the frame behind the machine, and count. For soybeans, about 40 beans in 10 square feet equal 1 bushel per acre, a figure that varies slightly among varieties.

Count at five spots at least. Embrapa asks for five points or more in each field because one count does not describe it. A Brazilian study of one soybean harvest found total loss reached 387.3 kilograms per hectare at 9 p.m., about 5.8 bushels per acre, and rose 121 percent between the first and last day. Write the date and the hour on each count.

Figure: Beans counted at five spots in one field of the example farm, against the limit of 88 beans. Source: example counts; the limit is 2.2 bushels per acre times 40
All five counts sit well above the limit of 88 beansBeans counted in a 10-square-foot frame at five spots: 150, 170, 160, 155 and 165. The limit is 88 beans, which is 2.2 bushels per acre. The average is 160 beans, or 4.0 bushels per acre.Beans in 10 square feet, by spot150170160155165Spot 1Spot 2Spot 3Spot 4Spot 5Dashed line: limit of 88 beansAverage 160 beans, or 4.0 bushels per acre

Did the header or the machine lose the grain?

A field total does not say which part of the combine lost the beans. The header cuts and gathers the plants and drops beans on the ground ahead of the machine. The parts inside, which thresh, separate and clean, lose them out the back.

The Georgia bulletin builds the split into the count. After the count behind the machine, back up no more than 20 feet and count a second frame just ahead of the header. That ground was cut but the rear of the combine never crossed it, so the count holds the beans that fell before the combine arrived plus the header’s loss. The difference between the two counts is what the inside of the machine lost.

On the example field, 100 beans ahead and 160 behind leave 60 beans, or 1.5 bushels per acre, lost inside the machine. The other 2.5 bushels per acre, 62 percent of the 4.0, came at the header or before it.

In a talk in Argentina, the header accounted for 70 to 80 percent of the soybean loss in a normal year. A survey in Maripá, Paraná, cites Embrapa work at 80 to 85 percent. The example field sits below both, which sends the operator and the agronomist to look inside the machine.

Figure: Where the 4.0 bushels per acre lost in the example field came from, against the limit of 2.2. Source: example counts, with the Georgia Extension split between the two counts
Of the 4.0 bushels per acre lost, 2.5 came at or before the header and 1.5 inside the machineCounted loss behind the combine is 4.0 bushels per acre. The count ahead of the header is 2.5, so the inside of the machine lost 1.5. The limit is 2.2.Counted loss behind the combine4.0limit 2.2At or before the header: 2.5Inside the machine: 1.5160 beans minus 100 beans is 60 beans

Is a loss over the limit the exception or the rule?

It depends on the region and the machine, and only a count tells you. In Maripá, Paraná, a survey of 39 combines on 25 farms found that 79 percent lost more than 60 kilograms per hectare, with an average of 98.5 kilograms, about 1.5 bushels per acre.

In the Mid-North of Mato Grosso, a survey of 16 combines found 69 percent at or under that level. The authors tie the machines above it to poor maintenance.

Each survey covers one region and a few seasons. They are a reason to count your own fields, not numbers to copy.

Figure: Share of combines at or under 60 kilograms of soybean loss per hectare in two Brazilian surveys. Source: Schanoski and colleagues; Zandonadi and colleagues. The Maripá share is 100 minus 79
Two surveys, two opposite results on the same toleranceIn Maripá, Paraná, 21 percent of 39 combines were at or under 60 kilograms per hectare. In the Mid-North of Mato Grosso, 69 percent of 16 combines were.Combines at or under 60 kg per hectareMaripá, Paraná: 39 combines21%Mid-North, Mato Grosso: 16 combines69%Bars drawn on a scale of 0 to 100 percent

What goes on the harvest sheet before the first field?

One sheet with a row per field. The limit and its date go in before the combine starts; the counts go in at each field.

The harvest record sheet, column by column
Column What it holds What goes wrong without it
Field The name or number of one field Two fields blur, and a bad one hides in the average
Limit and date The loss accepted, in bushels per acre, with the date and the name of who set it A limit written after the result excuses any number
Counted loss The average of at least five counts, in bushels per acre, with date and hour “It looked fine” stands in for a number
Where it came from At or before the header, or inside the machine A field over the limit with no clue where to look
Over or under A mark on every field above the limit Every field reads the same
Figure: One row of the harvest sheet, filled in with the example field. Source: example values from this article
One filled row of the harvest sheetLimit 2.2 bushels per acre, written before harvest. Counted loss 4.0 bushels per acre, from five counts with date and hour. Came from: 2.5 at or before the header and 1.5 inside the machine. Mark: over by 1.8 bushels per acre.Example field, soybeansLimit, written before harvest2.2 bushels per acreCounted loss4.0 bushels per acreaverage of five counts, with date and hourWhere it came from2.5 at or before the header1.5 inside the machineMarkOver the limit by 1.8 bushels per acreFiled with the harvest papers

A field over the limit gives you a place to look: that field, that pass, that part of the machine. Next season you examine the one or two marked fields instead of arguing about the whole crop.

Setting the combine and cutting the loss stay with the farmer and the agronomist; a separate article covers what the agronomist decides. If you already record each field’s yield, year by year, the counted loss belongs beside it, because it explains part of a thin year.

Measuring against a limit written beforehand is part of farm management. The production section of the library holds the other field records this one sits beside.

Provenance

Derives from
  1. Sumner, P. E.; Williams, E. J. Measuring Field Losses from Grain Combines. University of Georgia Extension, Bulletin B 973, 2012
  2. Silveira, J. M.; Conte, O. Determinação de perdas na colheita de soja: copo medidor da Embrapa. Embrapa Soja, 2013
  3. Marrón, G. Evaluación de pérdidas de cosecha en soja. Taller de máquinas cosechadoras, Aapresid, regional Del Campillo, 2010
  4. Schanoski, Righi and Werner, Perdas na colheita mecanizada de soja (Glycine max) no município de Maripá, PR, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 15(11), 2011
  5. Zandonadi, Ruffato and Figueiredo, Perdas na colheita mecanizada de soja na região Médio-Norte de Mato Grosso: safra 2012/2013, Nativa 3(1), 64-66, 2015
  6. Holtz and Reis, Perdas na colheita mecanizada de soja: uma análise quantitativa e qualitativa, Revista Ceres 60(3), 2013
What this article covers
Writing the soybean harvest loss you accept before harvest starts, with a date and the name of who set it; counting the loss in each field with a frame behind the combine; splitting it between the header and the inside of the machine; and marking which fields came in over the limit.
What it does not cover
How to set the combine, choose the header, or reduce the loss, which is work for the farmer and the agronomist. It does not hand you your final loss limit: the published tolerances differ across countries and crops, and the first one you write is only a starting point.
Published
Updated
Error found
Point out an error and the article is corrected with a note on what changed.

How to cite this article

Rurivia. (2026, September 11). Soybean harvest loss: write your limit before harvest. https://rurivia.com/en/library/production/the-harvest-loss-limit-you-set-first/


Keep reading

Production

Plant stand count: fix the day and method before seeding

The seeding rate is a number you already hold. The plants that came up are a number you have to count, on the same day and by the same method each season.

Sep 13, 2026
Production

How to tell if your crop rotation is working

Checking that the planned crop went into the field tells you the plan was followed, not whether it worked. For that, the plan has to say, field by field, which pest or disease the rotation is meant to hold back, when the result will be measured and what goes in if planting runs late.

Sep 7, 2026
Production

Field yield fell: the variety, the field, or the year?

A low harvest in the back field looks like the variety's fault. Often it was the year or the field, and only the field's own series, set against the farm average each season, tells them apart.

Sep 7, 2026
Production

Does it matter who pays your agronomist?

In a large-scale California study, a commission on the sale was not linked to more spraying; the clearest higher use, of insecticide and fungicide, came from advisers on a farm's own payroll. What you can settle is who decides, on a six-item page you sign with each agronomist.

Sep 5, 2026

Farm Management

If this article were a plant, farm management would be the whole field.

Planning, organizing, leading and controlling: the four functions, what each one decides, and a farm example for each, all on one page.